Use of technology as a learning tool

With the enhancement of technology that has been evident in the past years, technology has become an integral part of most of the activities carried out by humans. For instance, technology has become an integral part of business, socializing, and education. In the contemporary world, learning is aided by technology in all levels.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Use of technology as a learning tool specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More As children are introduced to learning, technological tools like smart phones, iPads, laptop computers, minicomputers etc., are increasingly being used. In other levels of learning, technology is inseparable with the learning process. It makes the learning process and the process of instruction an effortless task. This paper is an investigation of the ways in which technology can be used to enhance literacy learning, and how technology can be used in educating early year’s leaners . Instruction can prove to be a rather difficult task, especially if there is no sufficient equipment to aid it. This is especially the case if the learners are young, and thus they cannot easily understand what they are being taught. The use of technology in learning has come in handy in such situations. Young learners can now use technology tools both in school and at home to enhance their learning. Some of these tools include iPads, mini computers, laptop computers, smartphones etc. These tools are normally equipped with services that enable easier access of simplified information. For instance, children, with the help of their teachers and parents, can access graphical images on the internet that can help them in understanding their classwork. The same case applies with iPads and smartphones, which are equipped with high-speed internet connection. They can also play digital games that help to improve their analytical skills (Sweeney, 2010). For older learners, technology is, per haps, the most efficient learning tool being used today. The internet has enabled easier sharing of data, like notes, assignments, etc. In the contemporary classroom, assignments are submitted online, and the feedback to the same is also transmitted online. Tutors have the option to use projectors in classroom in order to reach students well without wasting too much time writing on the board. Technology has therefore made learning more effective, time saving, and even cheaper. The latter benefit can be explained by the fact that in the past, students had to print every assignment in order to be evaluated. Another technological tool that has found popularity among older learners is the use of blogs in learning. Teachers are increasingly encouraging their students to use blogs in their learning. Most of the teachers have their blogs on which students sign up and access materials like notes.Advertising Looking for essay on education? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first pa per with 15% OFF Learn More Perhaps the most beneficial aspect of blogs is their ease of sharing. Debates and discussions can be held on blogs, where students and their teacher post their contribution to a given controversial topic. This aids the learning process because the students are able to get different views on a particular topic and evaluate them to know which point is worth taking (Groff, 2009). Teachers may also share learning materials like notes and assignments on their blogs, or even communicate to their students about burning issues. From the above discussion, it is apparent that technology is a very useful learning tool. It has been used for both the preparatory levels of learning and the advanced levels of learning. It simplifies learning by enabling learners to access more information easily. This makes the learners stay up-to-date with information without wasting a lot of time. All learning institutions should thus appreciate this fact and embrace technolo gy in their learning programs. Reference List Groff, J. (2009). Using the technology of today, in the classroom today. Web. Sweeney, T. (2010). Student’ Use of ICT in the Early Years. Web. This essay on Use of technology as a learning tool was written and submitted by user Jonah A. to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Juveniles And Death Penalty Essays - Penology, Juvenile Court

Juveniles And Death Penalty Essays - Penology, Juvenile Court Juveniles And Death Penalty One of the most controversial issues in the rights of juveniles today is addressed in the question, Should the death penalty be applied to juveniles? For nearly a century the juvenile courts have existed to shield the majority of juvenile offenders from the full weight of criminal law and to protect their entitled special rights and immunities. In the case of kent vs. United states in 1996, Justice Fortas stated some of these special rights which include; Protection from publicity, confinement only to twenty-one years of age, no confinement with adults, and protection against the consequences of adult conviction such as the loss of civil rights, the use of adjudication against him in subsequent proceedings and disqualification of public employment (Kent vs. US 1966:1055). These special rights and immunities exist so that the justice courts can provide measures of guidance and rehabilitation for the child along with protection for society. However, there are some youths who are extrem ely dangerous and do not respond to attempts to reform themselves. The question is, should established mechanisms for transferring or waiving juvenile court jurisdiction in these exceptional cases take away these special rights and subject the youth to the full range of penalties for criminal behavior including, in some jurisdictions, execution (Thomson vs. State, 1986:784) ? Should These juveniles who perform the same malicious acts as some adult capital offenders be subject to the harshness of the criminal courts and the finality of the death penalty ? This paper will discuss a history of capital punishment for juveniles in the United States, methods of transferring juvenile cases to criminal courts, and also my position on the subject and justice of justice of juveniles and the death penalty. The constitutionality of the juvenile death penalty reached a settlement in 1988 in the case of Thompson v. Oklahoma when four Supreme Court Justices reached the conclusion that: persons under sixteen years of age cannot be sentenced to death (Thompson v. Oklahoma, 1988). Justice Stevens, Brennan, Marshall, and Blackmun considered these important issues as they were deliberating on the case: (1) Does a national consensus forbidding executions of juveniles exist?; (2) the extent to which the laws of other Western European nations prohibit or permit the execution of juveniles, and the opinions of respected professional organizations; (3) the degree to which the juveniles should be held responsible for their actions; (4) Whether the execution of juveniles contributed to the retributive or deterrent goals of punishment; and (5) Whether the small number of juveniles executed represents the waton and freakish application of the death penalty as condemned by Justice Stewart in Furman V. Geo rgia (Furman v. Georgia, 1972: 2763, Thompson v. Oklahoma, 1988: 487 U.S. 815). Following the decision, thirty eight states and the federal government created statutes authorizing the death penalty for certain forms of murder and other capital offenses ( Streib 1 of 2). Thompson v. Oklahoma held that no state within the minimum age line within its death penalty can go below the age of sixteen. Presently, fifteen states have chosen the min age of eighteen, four states have chosen the minimum age of seventeen (including Georgia), And twenty states have chosen the minimum age of sixteen (Streib 1 of 2). Before 1988, there was an uncertainty as to how the government should handle the juveniles and their capital crimes. There was one consensus among Justices and that was that the constitution and the Eighth Amendment did not outlaw juveniles receiving the death penalty. In furman v. Georgia (1972: 2823) justice powell wrote: ... The unswerving position that the court has taken in opinions spanning the last hundred years. On Virtually every occasion that any opinion has touched on the question . . . it has been asserted affirmatively, or tacitly assumed, that the Constitution does not prohibit the penalty. The Constitution, which has its roots in English Common Law, is not in violation in the case of juvenile death penalties. Before the minimum age of 16 statutes, English Common law from the 16th Century had a direct influence on the Constitution. This common law carried over to American statutes and established the presumption that no one under the age of seven had